FOX NEWS REPORTS ISRAELI SPIES ON 9/11 - CHRISTOPHER BOLLYN COMMENTS
Author and Journalist, Christopher Bollyn unpacks the deception in his book "Solving 9-11 - The Deception That Changed the World
Christoper Bollyn Website Here
This post is intended to highlight Christopher Bollyn’s research and reporting on the truth about the 9/11 False Flag that sent US troops to be massacred in a series of US/Israeli Empire wars in the middle east.
Bollyn’s focus on Zionism vs. Judaism is intended to fairly differentiate an inherently peaceful religion from terrorist policies of Zionism.
Bollyn’s book: Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed the World includes historical and geo-political background and examines the motivation of the people who played key roles in the destruction of the evidence and the obstruction of justice for the families of the victims. -
An Audio version of the Book, narrated by Bollyn is HERE
Joe Biden has repeatedly claimed, “you need not be a Jew to be a Zionist”
In 2001 Carl Cameron Reported on Israeli Spies involved in suspicious activities prior to the 9/11 False Flag. This may have been the last time Fox News came close to true investigative reporting.
Journalist Christopher Bollyn Backs Farrakhan on 9/11: Israel did it!
NOI Research - January 29, 2017
UPDATE: Mr. Christopher Bollyn addressed the Nation of Islam on February 18th, 2017 in Detroit on the subject of “The War on Islam: 9/11 Revisited, Uncovered & Exposed.” Watch the full program HERE
(video deleted by Youtube censors - See the video below)
An Audio version of the Book, SOLVING 9-11 is HERE
The Israeli Art Students, Gelatin & E-Team PSYOP
It's a wonderful distraction for the intellectually lazy.
Article and video: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-israeli-art-students-gelatin
No one believing Christopher Bollyn’s presentations about ‘Solving 9/11” notices that nowhere does he mention David Rockefeller as a suspect of the 9/11 crime or does he point a serious finger at SAIC and ARA and the 21 other NIST subcontractors, but you cannot disregard that A LOT of people knew that something was going to happen that day, as a lot of researchers have gone into depth on the insider trading, people not going to work the day, the war games and so much more bluff around WHAT happened to the Towers.
I would argue that Bollyn takes the attention away from the NIST subcontractors and the technology used on 9/11, that can free us from this false scarcity world we live in.
After all, Bollyn was the first first person to actually connect 9/11 to DEW in February 14, 2002.
Link: https://www.serendipity.li/wot/bollyn1.htm
As per usual, note the emphasis on the disinfo ‘high heat”, ‘lasers”, ‘vaporization”, ‘dust is only from concrete”, and of course ‘Jewish space laser” etc.
This was before David Icke’s book, which was published on October 11, 2002 and there is important background info you need to know about David Icke’s 9/11 disinformation.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/david-icke-on-911
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-facts-that-hurt-peoples-feelings
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-exactly-happened-to-all-7-buildings
Nuke Cancer from 9/11 http://stateofthenation.co/?p=108494